Upon opening the bottle, I was greeted by the dull sound of a minimally-carbonated beer lazily outgassing into the air. It poured similarly, thick liquid sauntering down the side of the glass. I can't in good faith notch a barrel-aged strong beer for low carbonation (they often lose a good deal of CO2 during the aging process), but Belgian-inspired beer shouldn't be this thick. The color is within the bounds of Belgian dubbel/quad. Overall, I say Oaked & Smoked breaks even on the eyes.
The aroma is as curious as the brewing process, all the more so because I cannot detect a whiff of whiskey. The smoked component, meanwhile, more closely resembles the peat smoke of Scotch than anything else. I have had cherrywood-smoked beer before; it doesn't smell or taste like peat. Perhaps it is some phenolic byproduct of the Belgian yeast they used. There are certainly some other phenols to be had here, lending a spice to the aroma.
Cherrywood-smoked malt, like oak-smoked malt or beechwood-smoked malt, should resemble campfire smoke with maybe a hint of burnt red meat; think smoked steak or bacon. I am disappointed to find none of those qualities here. Instead, we have a rather curious abrasion of peat smokey phenols (think Scotch whisky) married to the caramelized raisins of latent oxidation. The relationship is a bit rocky at this point. Some vanilla sweetness appears mid-palate, the only suggestion of oak present. No hint of bourbon or any other American whiskey, though that's presumably the source of the barrel. Not much more than a hint of ethanol heat. There is a fairly big flareup of medicinal flavors towards the end, not unlike accidentally biting a Tylenol tablet.
The texture is interesting, and probably the high point. The beer is thick and not especially carbonated, so I expected a sticky barley syrup with alcohol burn. There is a hint of alcohol heat, but its primary function is to keep the sweetness in check. The presence of so much phenolic flavors---peat, spice, that unfortunate touch of medicine---also dries the beer out a bit. Just to be clear, I can feel the presence of a thick sweet beer here, but it is deftly balanced. The acidity feels a bit high and out of whack but it doesn't offend, and never approaches sourness.
I should be tasting something resembling a rauchbier-dubbel
cocktail soaked in bourbon. This is not what I taste. Altogether not a bad beer, but a somewhat deceptive label. This would probably benefit mightily from a different (fruitier) Belgian yeast strain and a longer barrel-aging time.
I should be tasting something resembling a rauchbier-dubbel cocktail soaked in bourbon.
I should be tasting something resembling a rauchbier-dubbel cocktail soaked in bourbon.
rather a curious abrasion of peat-like phenols.
rather a curious abrasion of peat-like phenols.
No comments:
Post a Comment