The best-before code (28-04-15) means this was bottled April 28, 2010. |
Yes, I still have my review notebook from 2012. |
Though it's a bit blurry, you can see in the below photo that this beer still has a surprising amount of foam and carbonation five years out. The fizz almost gushed out of the bottle. The liquid itself retains the same ruddy brown hue as it had five years ago.
The aroma is just as rife with dates as it was when it was fresh. New this time: subtle hints of plums, milk chocolate, and licorice. The licorice is especially faint. Gone now are the spicy, peppery scents of phenols this beer is known for. Overall it smells appetizing but not as sweet as it did three years ago.
Rochefort 10 may smell great five years out but it tastes even better. The phenolic flavors are truly absent now, probably the biggest difference between fresh and aged. Rich flavors of date, fig, sugar, and more fig stand out the strongest, joined by additional hints of cinnamon, cherries, and plums. There is a very faint suggestion of licorice. As the beer warms I begin to appreciate pie crust, raisins, and the faintest sensation of alcohol heat, with a touch of milk chocolate as well. All of these flavors are held aloft by a surprisingly strong carbonation. The overall texture is medium in feel, erring a bit towards sweet.
I have aged beers to find them hold up well but not change much. Others have changed for the better or the worse, while some are changed for neither; they're just different. Rochefort 10 at five years feels to me like a success by any measure. The parts I didn't care for when fresh---raw ethanol and spicy yeast phenols---have mellowed or faded away entirely, while most of the best flavors have stayed or become stronger. The new flavors---plum, pie crust, chocolate, raisin---are welcome additions.
This is a classic when fresh that gets even better with a bit of time and patience. A real treat.
No comments:
Post a Comment